Skip to main content

White-Collar Litigation

Overview

White-collar exposure rarely begins with an arrest. It begins with a subpoena, a target letter, or a regulator asking for documents — and by the time it arrives, the government has usually been working the file for months.

The firm acts for companies and executives on both sides of that line: defending investigations and prosecutions, and litigating the commercial disputes that tend to follow them. They are frequently the same dispute seen from two different courtrooms.

In the investigative phase the priority is narrow — establish what the government actually has, control what gets produced, and where the facts allow, resolve the matter before any charge exists.

What we handle

White-Collar Litigation

01Government Investigations
02Complex Business Disputes
03Corporate Investigations
04Contract Litigation
05Civil RICO
06Corporate Governance
07Grand Jury

Commercial Litigation

01Contract Disputes
02Business Torts
03Real Estate Litigation
04Construction Litigation
05Partnership Disputes
06Insurance Coverage
07Negotiations
Leo Shalit on the steps of the courthouse

Results in this area

4 of 125 published matters

No Arrest

Defendant, the owner of a Pharmacy, was under investigation by the United States Department of Justice with respect to fraudulent billing practices related to Medicare. Investigating Agency: United States Department of Justice (DOJ) & Federal Bureau of Investigation. (FBI)

$100,000.00 Arbitration Award against Defendant

Represented Plaintiff Medical Billing Company alleged that Defendant Medical Office breached the terms of their Services Contract and was owed significant money. American Arbitration Association, New York County

Bench Trial Dismissal. Client owed no damages to Plaintiff.

Plaintiff, a former client, sued a Construction Permit Expediting Company for Breach of Contract associated with the performance of services.

Judgment Against Defendant For Entire Claim

Breach of Contract action to recover money following default and non-payment by the Defendants.

All case results

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every matter turns on its own facts.

What to expect

01

Free case evaluation

A confidential review of what has arrived — subpoena, target letter, regulatory demand — and what it indicates about the stage the matter has reached.

02

Exposure assessment

Establishing what the government or opposing party actually has, what is discoverable, and where the real risk sits, before any position is taken.

03

Engagement

Managing the production, the proffer and the negotiation. Where the matter can be resolved before charges or before suit, that is where it is resolved.

04

Litigation

Motion practice, trial, or arbitration where the matter proceeds — with the record built from the outset for that possibility.

Leo Shalit, Esq.

Leading this practice

Leo Shalit, Esq.

Principal Attorney

Meet the team

Common questions

I have received a subpoena. What does that mean?

A subpoena compels the production of documents or testimony. It does not by itself mean you are a target — witnesses and custodians of records receive them too — but how it is answered shapes what follows. The scope is often negotiable, and what gets produced is worth deciding with counsel rather than in a hurry.

What is a target letter?

A target letter is written notice from a federal prosecutor that you are the subject of a grand jury investigation. It arrives before any charge, which is precisely why it matters: it is the clearest available signal that the window to influence the outcome is still open.

Can an investigation end without charges?

It can, and where the facts allow that is the objective. Several matters in the firm's published results resolved at the investigative stage with no arrest and no charges filed. Whether that outcome is available depends on the evidence and the posture of the agency involved.

The company has counsel. Do I need my own?

Often, yes. Company counsel represents the company, and a company's interests and an individual employee's can diverge sharply — particularly once the company decides to cooperate. Where that divergence exists, separate representation protects the individual.

Free confidential case evaluation